Therefore, less than 10 percent of plants that were determined by other researchers are correct. Tucker, 2017 Stephen Bax, 2014) that led to wrong encompassing of plant species due to difficulty of determination. It is the only research of the Voynich Manuscript that is primarily and generally based on its linguistic source – the lexicology, but not on the analysis of phytomorphs’ similarities with herbarium specimens that were always made by other researchers ( J. ISBN: 978-609-475-419-7ħ.1 THE COMPLETE LIST OF ALL THE BOTANICAL NAMES DETERMINATED IN THE VOYNICH MANUSCRIPT WITH LATIN TAXONOMY, VERNACULAR BOTANICAL NAMES AND LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE ORIGIN OF NOMENCLATURES WITH THEIR SOURCES IN THE MEDIEVAL PERIOD.Īll botanical names that have been identified in the Voynich Manuscript have been deciphered and read in the very text of the Voynich Manuscript. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing from the copyright holder. The first print is a limited-edition, non-commercial, nonprofit, dedicated to science popularization proposals for foreign editors, publishers and research academic societies.
The linguistic basis of the text, index and analysis.ĭepartment of Spanish Philology, Vilnius University. THE DECIPHERING THE WHOLE TEXT OF THE VOYNICH MANUSCRIPT BY ALISA GLADYŠEVA.